Amino-acid PET versus MRI guided re-irradiation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme - a randomised phase II trial
This study is designed to test if a radiotherapy target volume delineation based on Amino-acid PET (AA-PET) leads to an improvement in progression free survival in patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-irradiation, compared to target volume delineation based on Gadolinium contrast enhanced T1 weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (T1Gd-MRI).

Inclusion criteria
- Local recurrence of GBM (WHO grade IV) and either not eligible for tumor resection or with macroscopic residual tumor after resection of recurrent GBM
- Histological confirmation of GBM at initial or secondary diagnosis
- Previous radiation therapy of the primary with a maximal total dose 59-60 Gy
- At least 6 months since the end of pre-irradiation
- Recurrent tumor visible on AA-PET and T1Gd-MRI with the diameter measuring 1cm to 6cm by either technique
- Target volume definition possible according to both study arms
- Start of re-irradiation possible within 2 weeks from FET-PET and MRI
- Patient's written IC obtained on the day of FET-PET acquisition or latest the day after FET-PET acquisition
- Legal capacity
- Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) > 60%
- Age ≥18 years (no upper limit of age)
- Registration
Exclusion criteria
- No histological confirmation of GBM
- Recent (≤4 weeks before IC) histological result showing no tumor recurrence
- No prior radiation treatment to the primary tumor
- More than 2 previous chemotherapy regimes or previous treatment with Avastin or other molecular targeted therapies
- Technical impossibility to use MRI or FET-PET for Radiation Therapy (RT)-planning
- Less than 2 weeks between application of chemotherapy and planned start of re-irradiation
- Less than 3 weeks between resection of recurrent GBM and planned start of re-irradiation
- Chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapies planned during re-irradiation
- Additional chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy or further surgery planned before diagnosis of further tumor progression after study intervention
- Female patients of childbearing potential who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Fertile patients refusing to use safe contraceptive methods during the study
- Known allergy against the MRI contrast agent Gadolinium or the PET tracer 18F FET or against any of the components